Will The FSA (Free Sh.t Army) Win in November?

 

In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior: “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a Dictatorship.”

 “The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith;

From spiritual faith to great courage;

From courage to liberty;

From liberty to abundance;

From abundance to complacency;

From complacency to apathy;

From apathy to dependence; (*WE ARE HERE)

From dependence back into bondage.”

Get Ready for Some Bigger Changes than we have already experienced the last few years!

“The nature of government is force and always has been.  That is why there should be as little of it as possible.  Unfortunately, we’ve decided to go in the opposite direction.” 

 

11 responses to “Will The FSA (Free Sh.t Army) Win in November?”

  1. Anonymous says :

    If this blog is about thr retirement settlement – then stop stiring the pot about other topics and just post about the retirement!!

    Like

    • Anonymous says :

      I think there just killing time until some news pops out on the settlement. Your not part of the FSA are you who liked communism and socialism and spread the weath from each according to his ability….to each according to his needs?

      Like

      • Anonymous says :

        You must be an Obama supporter!

        Like

      • Anonymous says :

        Why bother? If the content of a reply does not suit this blog, they censor them. Many if not most comments do not see the light of day. The blog is run by communists and Obama kool aid drinkers!

        Like

        • trustedboeing says :

          Exactly the opposite. This blog is trying to show that the policies of our government and many large corporations are fascist (government and corporation partnerships which violate the Constitution and thwart free enterprise), socialist and communistic; that there is no longer the “rule of law” which applies equally to the common person and the well-connected; that the majority of citizens in this country have no clue that we are a constitutionally-limited representative Republic, not a democracy where majority rules and Cindy and Paul can vote to confiscate Peter’s property just because they are the majority; that the majority of our citizens are now embracing socialism/communism as is reflected in the policies promised by the presidential candidates the parties have put forth; that our country is already more socialistic than free enterprise because of the preceding items mentioned; that the politicians and many government employees take an oath to support and defend the Constitution, but do the everything they can to bypass and ignore it; and that this is leading to a social and financial breakdown which is getting worse very quickly. How does this relate to us getting screwed by Boeing, Spirit, the unions, lawyers, IRS and the court? It is because of this flaunting of the Constitutional safeguards, crony-capitalism/fascism and rampant corruption in government and business that has allowed us to get screwed in such a blatant manner. Can you not understand this?

          Like

          • Anonymous says :

            Still doesn’t answer the question of why you continue to censor? Oh, just like big brother, you know better than we do on what kind and how much criticism we can stand? WRONG! If I make a comment on here, then I welcome the response, whether or not I like it or not. We are adults here, we can put our big people pants on and deal with it. I do not need or want respect, bring it on, I can and will take it, and I sure as hell do not need you blog persons making that decision for me!

            Like

          • trustedboeing says :

            Comments which add to a discussion or provide new information, links to other articles or attempt to rebut the positions taken in a post are all welcomed and encouraged. We used to allow all comments to post but commentors started getting carried-away with vulgar and derogatory comments which served no purpose other than to try to start a fight. There are other social media outlets where people can engage is purposeless banter.

            Like

        • Anonymous says :

          You bet, you post this, but what about all the posts you do NOT post? I know from personal experience, many times over! So who gives a damn if someone is getting flamed? If they have it coming, why withhold their freedom of speech to respond?

          Like

          • trustedboeing says :

            These type of comments serve no useful purpose: “Up your rear, same place as your head keeping each other company.” If you are making these type of vulgar and derogatory comments, don’t expect them to get through. This is not a blog for people to “flame” each other. You can disagree with someone without name calling.

            Like

  2. Anonymous says :

    Hell yeah! A reply to a derogatory comment!!! Again, I do not need you telling me what I can and can’t handle. You are NOT consistent with everyone whatsoever! This blog is not worth my time or trouble. The recent blanket emails are much more informative that this crappy blog!

    Like

    • trustedboeing says :

      It is not a question of what you can or cannot handle; it is a question of posting something with information potentially useful to the readers. If you disagree, go ahead and state your case–just do so without vulgarity, flames or threats (not saying you have used threatening language, just that others have).

      Like

Leave a comment